IT'S TIME FOR ACTION! Again.
HB1030 was read today in the Senate and assigned to the Senate Transportation Committee. It is not yet on an agenda but it is time to contact the Senate Transportation Committee: sen.Cammack@state.sd.us, sen.hunhoff@state.sd.us, sen.monroe@state.sd.us, sen.Otten@state.sd.us, sen.solano@state.sd.us, sen.peterson@state.sd.us, sen.Vehle@state.sd.us.
All the same words used before for the representatives are valid for the senators. There is increasing opposition to this bill which is no surprise. Apparently South Dakota roads are now too narrow and not straight enough for safe bicycle travel.
Or, be inspired by this wise man and send them a letter...
Wednesday, February 18, 2015
Sunday, February 15, 2015
Rumbles!! Part 2
Tuesday 10am HB 1214 - the reflective clothing bill - will be considered by the House Transportation Committee. At 2pm HB 1030 - the 3' passing bill - will be considered by the full House.
In the meantime...
Read Rumbles!! Part 1 here.
This complete "Rumbles!!" series is a demonstration of the value
that Argus Leader Journalist David Montgomery has brought to the local cycling
community. Without this article as the starting point the
destruction of this piece of cycling habitat - Highway 151 south of Hartford - would
have been a surprise to most and seemed anonymous.
To be sure my view is the riding community ought to take responsibility and be their own watchdog. To be equally sure there simply aren’t
enough riders engaged enough in the process of how cycling habitat is created
and destroyed to be very effective.
Here David Montgomery filled some of the gap. He caught something
in a meeting somewhere and it registered enough with him to make some calls and
write an article. Because of this, the rumbles planned for Highway 151 will not
be a surprise and will not be done seemingly anonymously; at least to me and
followers of The MinusCar Project.
I view this as my newspaper subscription dollars being put to good use directly
connecting and contributing to the work I do for bicycle advocacy.
---
David Montgomery named names. Let’s look at the starting
lineup, the players involved – pulled directly from the Argus Leader article in
order of appearance:
Minnehaha County Commission – sometime between December 13
and 20, 2014 they approved rumble stripes on Highway 151. As an elected body they
should at least pretend to care about me and my concerns. Maybe there’s even
one of them that would champion my concerns. Some of them I may have voted for
or against in elections, but to be honest I do not know which.
Minnehaha County Commission Chairwoman Cindy Heiberger – a
cyclist! She’s concerned about creating the hazard! “Bicyclists beware,” she
says. As an elected official she should at least pretend to care about me and
my concerns. However, she is not someone that I am eligible to vote for, she
lives elsewhere.
Larry Hayes – private citizen, local rider of bicycles.
Andy Vandel – Highway Safety Engineer with the South Dakota Department of Transportation.
State staff should be reasonably responsive to a reasonable number of reasonable
requests.
---
To me the most glaring thing
in this article is not at all related to rumbles. It’s the claim by Department of
Transportation Andy Vandel that “they have a dedicated liaison to bicyclist
groups.” This is both damning and encouraging.
It’s damning because as a leading bicycle advocate in South
Dakota nobody has ever presented themselves to me as a dedicated liaison to
bicycle groups. I checked with four other leading advocates in the area and
they all agreed, nobody had ever presented to them as being a dedicated
liaison.
It’s encouraging too! Because – have you heard?!? – the state
has a dedicated liaison to cycling groups. Might has well see if I can meet them...
Saturday, February 07, 2015
SD House: I'm Just a Bicycle Bill
I'm monitoring with interest 3 bills in the South Dakota House.
HB1030 - the 3' bicycle passing bill. It is currently in the House Transportation Committee listed on the February 10th agenda as a "bill for possible action which [has] had prior hearing." At the moment I'm satisfied with the work that's been done on this bill. However it's been 10 days since I've heard anything about it so I'm a little nervous for what could happen while I can't see.
HB1032 - the protection for pedestrians in crosswalks bill. This is also listed as a "bill for possible action..." on the House Transportation Committee February 10th agenda.This one got hastily tabled January 22 by a 9 to 4 vote after Rep Stalzer pretended to know that traffic in Sioux Falls would get really backed up if it passed.
Perhaps the 9 yays were just annoyed to have to consider so much biking and walking in what they previously had experienced as an internal combustion transportation committee.
Five days later on January 27 Bolin and Duvall prevailed by a 7 to 5 vote to take another look at it. Feickert, Schaeffer and Werner had previously voted to table but were willing to go along for a second ride.
I'm not too worried about this one. I think it's extreme to have a legal requirement to wait for a pedestrian to completely cross a street before moving through an intersection. But I'm also guy who practices transportational walking and all too often I've got an idiot driving across my heels in anticipation of his next Big Mac. So pass the bill sure, but try to find a way to amend it.
HB1214 - the reflective or florescent bicycle clothing bill. This one is assigned to the House Transportation Committee but has not yet appeared on any agenda. It's an alarming bill that it is our duty as South Dakota riders to keep from becoming law. I understand Wyoming successfully fought off their 2015 version. Oklahoma is working one too. We must not become the first state to have this law.
I am currently happy with the work that has been done on this bill - but like HB1030 I acknowledge that bills can change when nobody can see.
Please. Let it be enough that the Federal standard for bicycles is that they ship with a white front and red rear reflectors. That South Dakota Law requires a lamp on the front and a reflector or lamp on the rear of every bicycle. Finally, that the problem with the visibility of bicycles is that too many riders fail to ride where they can be seen. Sometimes it's because they're afraid to be in the street and other times it's because the only place far too many drivers are looking is at a cell phone screen.
HB1030 - the 3' bicycle passing bill. It is currently in the House Transportation Committee listed on the February 10th agenda as a "bill for possible action which [has] had prior hearing." At the moment I'm satisfied with the work that's been done on this bill. However it's been 10 days since I've heard anything about it so I'm a little nervous for what could happen while I can't see.
HB1032 - the protection for pedestrians in crosswalks bill. This is also listed as a "bill for possible action..." on the House Transportation Committee February 10th agenda.This one got hastily tabled January 22 by a 9 to 4 vote after Rep Stalzer pretended to know that traffic in Sioux Falls would get really backed up if it passed.
Perhaps the 9 yays were just annoyed to have to consider so much biking and walking in what they previously had experienced as an internal combustion transportation committee.
Five days later on January 27 Bolin and Duvall prevailed by a 7 to 5 vote to take another look at it. Feickert, Schaeffer and Werner had previously voted to table but were willing to go along for a second ride.
I'm not too worried about this one. I think it's extreme to have a legal requirement to wait for a pedestrian to completely cross a street before moving through an intersection. But I'm also guy who practices transportational walking and all too often I've got an idiot driving across my heels in anticipation of his next Big Mac. So pass the bill sure, but try to find a way to amend it.
HB1214 - the reflective or florescent bicycle clothing bill. This one is assigned to the House Transportation Committee but has not yet appeared on any agenda. It's an alarming bill that it is our duty as South Dakota riders to keep from becoming law. I understand Wyoming successfully fought off their 2015 version. Oklahoma is working one too. We must not become the first state to have this law.
I am currently happy with the work that has been done on this bill - but like HB1030 I acknowledge that bills can change when nobody can see.
Please. Let it be enough that the Federal standard for bicycles is that they ship with a white front and red rear reflectors. That South Dakota Law requires a lamp on the front and a reflector or lamp on the rear of every bicycle. Finally, that the problem with the visibility of bicycles is that too many riders fail to ride where they can be seen. Sometimes it's because they're afraid to be in the street and other times it's because the only place far too many drivers are looking is at a cell phone screen.
Friday, February 06, 2015
Saturday Coffee Shop Ride:February 21
The next Saturday Coffee Shop Ride will be February 21. For those scoring at home, indeed the 21st is February's third Saturday. It will depart from MB Hasketts - 324 S Phillips Ave. We're going to climb 1000ft and primarily explore two or three neighborhoods boxed by 10th & 41st & Cleveland & Bahnson.
Remember the ride leaves at 9am. The loop is just about 10 miles and weather adjustable. We'll enjoy coffee or full breakfast after. There are general expectations of the Saturday Coffee Shop Rides. Faster riders may find the slowish speed of this ride mentally taxing.
The route goes a little something like this:
(apparently embedding isn't working so well - click here for a map)
Remember the ride leaves at 9am. The loop is just about 10 miles and weather adjustable. We'll enjoy coffee or full breakfast after. There are general expectations of the Saturday Coffee Shop Rides. Faster riders may find the slowish speed of this ride mentally taxing.
The route goes a little something like this:
(apparently embedding isn't working so well - click here for a map)
Tuesday, February 03, 2015
Today in South Dakota Bicycle Legislation
The Transportation Committee met today and discussed HB 1131
the “increase road funding” bill. I feared the possibility of an amendment that
would make a tax specific for bicycles or riders. My fears were not realized
today. The committee amended the bill a few times and then talked about
referring the bill to the State Affairs Committee. Upon further consideration
they instead deferred discussion to Thursday 2/12. After two hours of HB 1131
Duvall had had enough and her motion to adjourn was readily seconded by Hickey
and quickly agreed to by the others over their shoulders no the way out the door.
What about HB 1030 the “3’ passing bill?” It is on Thursday’s
2/5 agenda.
But wait! That’s not all! Remember when Rep Deutsch was
being asked to kindly remove his helmet prop from atop his head? Rep Rasmussen
indicated she had a bill that is complimentary to his yellow helmet? It has
perhaps arrived!
South Dakota now has its very own “reflective & fluorescent
clothing” bill. Meet HB 1214. It has not yet been assigned to a committee.
“Any person operating a bicycle on a highway shall wear
garments made of fluorescent or reflective material. A violation of this
section is a Class 2 misdemeanor.”
I do not like this bill. This bill should not pass. Please
don’t let this bill pass. Wardrobe choices should not be legislated.
Here are some arguments against…
In 2010 Sen Jerstad’s 3’ passing bill was amended with a
similar requirement. The South Dakota Bicycle Coalition (such as it was) promptly dropped its
support of the bill.
The effectiveness of reflective or bright clothing is
doubtful. As a bicycle educator I recommend bright clothing as a reasonable
option. In practice I wear what I have on. Sometimes my clothes reflect black. Cyclists
have visibility problems because they are not willing to ride where drivers are
looking. It is also increasingly difficult to ride where drivers are looking.
I can’t fit myself between a driver’s face and their cell phone.
Bicycling is the cheapest and most efficient form of transportation
in the world. Bicycling is the way many poor people move around. It is not
appropriate to legislate what a person should wear to work.
And then there’s SDCL 32-17-25 – with thanks to Jessica for leading me through this...
“Bicycle lamps--Visibility and color--Violation as petty
offense. Every bicycle shall be equipped
with a lighted lamp on the front thereof visible under normal atmospheric
conditions from a distance of at least three hundred feet in front of such
bicycle and shall also be equipped with a reflex mirror or lamp on the rear
exhibiting a yellow or red light visible under like conditions from a distance
of at least two hundred feet to the rear of such bicycle. A violation of this
section is a petty offense.”
See that riders are already required to have a lamp on the
front and a reflector or lamp on the back. I fail to grasp the improvement of having
the reflective or colorful item on the person rather than the machine.
Also note failure to have lights carries the penalty of “petty
offense.” It is provable that lack of lighting is a strong contributor to
bicycle/car crashing. The penalty for riding without reflective or fluorescent garments
will be a Class 2 misdemeanor which is akin to speeding. The disparity of these
two punishments is irreconcilable.
Someday soon this bill will land in a committee. Stay awake.Saturday, January 31, 2015
Saturday Coffee Shop Ride: Next! 2/21
First: the next Saturday Coffee Shop Ride is February 21. We'll depart from MB Haskett's 324 S Phillips Ave. February is one of the months where we don't wait for the last Saturday of the month.
Second: the general expectations of the Saturday Coffee Shop Rides. Faster riders may find the speed of this ride a bit mentally challenging.
Next: a photo of January's group.
Friday, January 30, 2015
Rumbles!! Part 1
Today while I was standing in the Minnehaha County Administration Building parking lot talking bikes with local riding legend Larry Hayes we observed an orange body on two wheels doing fat bike repeats on the 6th Street hill.
Warning: he's already beating you.
Why was I in the Minnehaha County Administration Building parking lot? It's because on 12/22 the Argus Leader printed this article.
Coming soon, how journalism matters to advocacy and activism.
Outdoor Campus Gets Bike Ed
May 23rd the Outdoor Campus is hosting a four hour "Need to Know" class. This class will be led by myself with Clint, Chris and Kurt. A bike education experience hosted by the State of South Dakota.
Thursday, January 29, 2015
HB1030 - Making Spicy Sausage
Last Tuesday HB 1030 got assigned to a Transportation Committee Sub-Committee so that 4 or 5 of them could take a good hard patient look at the problem and decide some language that suits them. My friend Chris Parsley sat in and participated on one - and perhaps the only one - meeting. If no further action is taken on the bill by the sub-committee there should be some pretty nice language regarding the passing of a bicyclist presented to the whole committee. Rep Fred Deutsch seemed to have the an accurate inside track on the language.
But these things don't happen in a vacuum. Maybe by the next time this bill is discussed in the Transportation Committee proper, it will have changed dramatically. One never knows.
When will this bill be discussed in the Transportation Committee? Rep Vericho is the chair. The chair sets the agenda. Ask the chair. As of now it is not on the agenda for the 2/3 meeting. I suppose a motion to consider the bill could come on 2/3. So I'll be listening via SDPR in case it does.
On the agenda for 2/3 is HB 1131 - "revise certain taxes and fees to fund improvements to public roads and bridges in South Dakota." This is a hugely important bill for the funding of our infrastructure.
In the context of HB 1030 It's consideration sends a chill down my spine. For all the times I heard the chair joke, then half joke, then no joke suggest taxing riders and bicycles HB1131 is the bill that could make that happen. So I'll be listening on 2/3 anyway.
But these things don't happen in a vacuum. Maybe by the next time this bill is discussed in the Transportation Committee proper, it will have changed dramatically. One never knows.
When will this bill be discussed in the Transportation Committee? Rep Vericho is the chair. The chair sets the agenda. Ask the chair. As of now it is not on the agenda for the 2/3 meeting. I suppose a motion to consider the bill could come on 2/3. So I'll be listening via SDPR in case it does.
On the agenda for 2/3 is HB 1131 - "revise certain taxes and fees to fund improvements to public roads and bridges in South Dakota." This is a hugely important bill for the funding of our infrastructure.
In the context of HB 1030 It's consideration sends a chill down my spine. For all the times I heard the chair joke, then half joke, then no joke suggest taxing riders and bicycles HB1131 is the bill that could make that happen. So I'll be listening on 2/3 anyway.
Tuesday, January 27, 2015
HB1030 - Opening Pandora's Box
Well South Dakota riders. Your House Transportation Committee has formed a sub-committee to look at all bicycles laws and try to align them so that they can figure out how to make safe passing a reality. The full committee expressed their desires for the sub-committee and many of them go far beyond the scope of a 3' passing bill.
Sunday, January 25, 2015
Saturday Coffee Shop Ride:This Week!
First. Bike it!
Here is a link to information about the general expectations of attending a Saturday Coffee Shop Ride.
Here is a link to route information specific to this month's ride on January 31 @ 9am from Starbucks on 13th & Minnesota Ave.
The route has been tested. We'll tour extensively in the area north of Russell and south of the Airport. We'll ride past the air base, we'll stop at an historical marker and review some history of the area, we'll note the progress of Badlands Pawn which should have freshly broken ground by that time.
We'll also observe the lesser known South Dakota Navy Base.
Come and join us on our Saturday Coffee Shop Ride, a very Americana edition.
Thursday, January 22, 2015
HB1030 = 3 Feet Please:Committee Consideration
Today the House Transportation Committee considered HB1030 South Dakota's second attempt at passing a 3' Passing Bill for bicyclists. These are three of the very handsome folks who testified in favor of the bill. They are: Fred Deutsch freshman representative from District 04, Jessica Andrews from Chamberlain, & Chris Parsley from Sioux Falls.
If you want to know the gritty details of what went down in room 413 you simply must listen to this audio recording. Start at minute 24 and listen until they stop talking about bicycles. You'll catch Fred's Freshman Fashion Faux Pas - no helmets allowed in committee and Chris, when asked about shoulder rumbles bothered to mention the seeming inability of South Dakota drivers to stay on the road - to widespread chuckles I might add.
Speaking of inability to stay on the road...
...no pedestrians were killed during the destruction of this sign...
...perhaps we should rumble Kiwanis Ave. That's glass, but I digress.
Seriously South Dakota riders owe these three a very big debt of gratitude. They did very nice work for all of us. Seriously. I mean it. Chris and Jessica did this on their own time.
There are some other folks heavily involved in the effort. DOT legal counsel Bill Nevin has been assigned the job by the DOT to present the bill. The American Heart Association of South Dakota has active transportation/healthly lifestyles on their advocacy agenda therefore they've done great work in support of this bill.
The broad strokes...District 09 Rep Steve Hickey moved an amendment to include the important word "minimum" to modify the required 3 feet. The amendment passed. Then the questions of obfuscation rolled in. The main concerns seemed to be about the possibility that existing laws already meet the goal of a 3' passing law and the question of whether riders already pay enough to be allowed on the roads in the first place.
Rounds moved to pass the bill with a second from Hickey. A substitute motion from Stalzer/Kaiser to defer the bill to Tuesday 1/27 prevailed.
In our estimation there are 2 strong opponents and 3 strong proponents of this bill. That leaves 8 on the fence. These folks will be talking about this bill between now and Tuesday. Quick notes to all the committee members, yes again, are important. The page to do that from is here.
...and come back here Tuesday.
Seriously South Dakota riders owe these three a very big debt of gratitude. They did very nice work for all of us. Seriously. I mean it. Chris and Jessica did this on their own time.
There are some other folks heavily involved in the effort. DOT legal counsel Bill Nevin has been assigned the job by the DOT to present the bill. The American Heart Association of South Dakota has active transportation/healthly lifestyles on their advocacy agenda therefore they've done great work in support of this bill.
The broad strokes...District 09 Rep Steve Hickey moved an amendment to include the important word "minimum" to modify the required 3 feet. The amendment passed. Then the questions of obfuscation rolled in. The main concerns seemed to be about the possibility that existing laws already meet the goal of a 3' passing law and the question of whether riders already pay enough to be allowed on the roads in the first place.
Rounds moved to pass the bill with a second from Hickey. A substitute motion from Stalzer/Kaiser to defer the bill to Tuesday 1/27 prevailed.
In our estimation there are 2 strong opponents and 3 strong proponents of this bill. That leaves 8 on the fence. These folks will be talking about this bill between now and Tuesday. Quick notes to all the committee members, yes again, are important. The page to do that from is here.
...and come back here Tuesday.
Tuesday, January 20, 2015
HB1030 Has Its Day
HB 1030 - the 3' Passing Bill - is up for discussion in the Transportation Committee during it's Thursday 10am meeting. I wonder which South Dakota riders will go to Pierre and stand for all South Dakota cyclists and say, "Please pass this bill. There are people injured and killed and the awareness through this laws will save lives."
Readers should understand the message that is sent by the absence of a cyclist.
Hey Black Hills. Raise your hand if you contacted your friend from Hill City, the chair of the committee. I understand he's a tough one.
Also, HB1032 - the one that protects pedestrians is also on the agenda.
Thursday, January 15, 2015
Saturday Coffee Shop Ride:January 31
The next Saturday Coffee Shop Ride will be January 31. It will depart from Starbucks on 14th and Minnesota Ave. We'll explore the happy little industrial complex hidden away north of Russell Ave and south of the airport.
Remember the ride leaves at 9am. The loop is always just about 10 miles. We'll enjoy coffee after.
The untested version of the route looks a exactly like this:
Remember the ride leaves at 9am. The loop is always just about 10 miles. We'll enjoy coffee after.
The untested version of the route looks a exactly like this:
Friday, January 09, 2015
Legislative Alert: HB 1030
It’s officially official. HB 1030 is a bicycle related bill that will work its way through the South Dakota Legislature this winter. Riders will want to pay attention to this bill. When laws are scrutinized anything can happen to them. Additions, deletions, omissions. The last time a bicycle bill was in the legislature South Dakota was close to becoming the first state in the union to legislate cyclist wardrobe – and that was on a 3 foot passing bill.
This year HB 1030 is mostly a 3 foot passing bill. Notably this bill seems to have originated with the Department of Transportation. My sense is a change to law recommended by state staff is more likely to be successful.
Part I
The bill will introduce a new section into the books that reads:
“The driver of any motor vehicle overtaking a bicycle proceeding in the same direction shall allow a three foot separation between the right side of the driver's vehicle, including any mirror or other projection, and the left side of the bicycle. The driver of the motor vehicle shall maintain that separation until safely past the overtaken bicycle. A violation of this section is a Class 2 misdemeanor.”
I’m pretty ok with adding this into law. I do recommend adding the word MINIMUM in the sentence “shall allow a three foot separation.” Many riders say 3 feet isn’t enough and adding this word implies more is better.
Part II
The bill will amend an existing law. The bold portion indicates the amendment:
A person operating a bicycle shall give a continuous signal of intention to turn right or left during the last one hundred feet traveled by the bicycle before turning. The signal shall also be given while the bicycle is stopped waiting to turn. A signal by hand and arm need only be given intermittently if the hand is needed in the control operation of the bicycle. No driver of a bicycle may overtake another vehicle on the right if the overtaken vehicle is signaling to make a right turn.
I am always happy to point out the most dangerous place to ride is to the right of a right turning vehicle. How do you know vehicle is turning right? You don’t. This amendment would make it illegal to ride to the right of a right turn signaling vehicle. I say don’t ride to the right of any vehicle.
I’m neutral on this amendment while pointing out my personal standards are more strict than this amendment would require.
--
So write your state representatives. Get them early. They don’t start real work till Monday. Tell them this weekend what you think of HB 1030. Surprise them by showing them you care.
Find your reps now!!!
This year HB 1030 is mostly a 3 foot passing bill. Notably this bill seems to have originated with the Department of Transportation. My sense is a change to law recommended by state staff is more likely to be successful.
Part I
The bill will introduce a new section into the books that reads:
“The driver of any motor vehicle overtaking a bicycle proceeding in the same direction shall allow a three foot separation between the right side of the driver's vehicle, including any mirror or other projection, and the left side of the bicycle. The driver of the motor vehicle shall maintain that separation until safely past the overtaken bicycle. A violation of this section is a Class 2 misdemeanor.”
I’m pretty ok with adding this into law. I do recommend adding the word MINIMUM in the sentence “shall allow a three foot separation.” Many riders say 3 feet isn’t enough and adding this word implies more is better.
Part II
The bill will amend an existing law. The bold portion indicates the amendment:
A person operating a bicycle shall give a continuous signal of intention to turn right or left during the last one hundred feet traveled by the bicycle before turning. The signal shall also be given while the bicycle is stopped waiting to turn. A signal by hand and arm need only be given intermittently if the hand is needed in the control operation of the bicycle. No driver of a bicycle may overtake another vehicle on the right if the overtaken vehicle is signaling to make a right turn.
I am always happy to point out the most dangerous place to ride is to the right of a right turning vehicle. How do you know vehicle is turning right? You don’t. This amendment would make it illegal to ride to the right of a right turn signaling vehicle. I say don’t ride to the right of any vehicle.
I’m neutral on this amendment while pointing out my personal standards are more strict than this amendment would require.
--
So write your state representatives. Get them early. They don’t start real work till Monday. Tell them this weekend what you think of HB 1030. Surprise them by showing them you care.
Find your reps now!!!
Saturday, December 27, 2014
Friday, December 19, 2014
South Dakota Legislature Alert: Another Attempt at 3' Minimum to Pass & Natasha's Law
When politicians look hard at riding - surprise changes can come from left field.
---
3' Minimum when Passing
It sounds like there's a strong possibility of a 2015 run at a 3' passing law in the South Dakota legislature. I've heard it from two independent sources. In November I responded to a Mitchell representative's request for the text of our Sioux Falls 3' Passing ordinances.
I think it's fine to have a state level 3' passing law. Many other states have one. If conditions are right I think such a bill deserves rider support.
But there's plenty of problems that come with such a push. During the previous attempt to pass such a law the primary sponsor Sandy Jerstad failed to get transportation committee support for the bill. She smoked it out to the floor for a vote. In a failed attempt to get votes, she was willing to make a state law that riders must wear reflective clothing while riding.
---
Natasha's Law
This fall KDLT ran a story "A Mother's Fight For Justice" announcing a call for legislation named Natasha's Law. This legislation calls for stiffer penalties for drivers that cause bicyclist and pedestrian fatalities. This week people with signs were observed near the place of Natasha's death. Googling Natasha's Law reveals a MoveOn petition and description.
It seems ok to have stronger penalties for destroying innocent lives. Many states have passed "Vulnerable Road User" laws. As riders we know all too well that penalties seem pretty weak. I invite a listen to Freakomomic's "The Perfect Crime" to learn that the perfect crime is indeed running over a pedestrian with a car.
---
Sounds like some rider diligence will be necessary this winter to be sure our legislators don't play loose with the means while they try to justify an ends.
When politicians look hard at riding - surprise changes can come from left field.
---
3' Minimum when Passing
It sounds like there's a strong possibility of a 2015 run at a 3' passing law in the South Dakota legislature. I've heard it from two independent sources. In November I responded to a Mitchell representative's request for the text of our Sioux Falls 3' Passing ordinances.
I think it's fine to have a state level 3' passing law. Many other states have one. If conditions are right I think such a bill deserves rider support.
But there's plenty of problems that come with such a push. During the previous attempt to pass such a law the primary sponsor Sandy Jerstad failed to get transportation committee support for the bill. She smoked it out to the floor for a vote. In a failed attempt to get votes, she was willing to make a state law that riders must wear reflective clothing while riding.
---
Natasha's Law
This fall KDLT ran a story "A Mother's Fight For Justice" announcing a call for legislation named Natasha's Law. This legislation calls for stiffer penalties for drivers that cause bicyclist and pedestrian fatalities. This week people with signs were observed near the place of Natasha's death. Googling Natasha's Law reveals a MoveOn petition and description.
It seems ok to have stronger penalties for destroying innocent lives. Many states have passed "Vulnerable Road User" laws. As riders we know all too well that penalties seem pretty weak. I invite a listen to Freakomomic's "The Perfect Crime" to learn that the perfect crime is indeed running over a pedestrian with a car.
---
Sounds like some rider diligence will be necessary this winter to be sure our legislators don't play loose with the means while they try to justify an ends.
When politicians look hard at riding - surprise changes can come from left field.
Thursday, December 18, 2014
Saturday Coffee Shop Ride: Kaladis 12/27 9am
Saturday 12/27 is the first Saturday Coffee Shop Ride. We'll meet at the 26th & Minnesota Ave Kaladis. The planned route is a 10 mile loop through town. At the completion of the loop we'll step inside the shop and enjoy a nice toasty warm beverage.
The planned route goes a little something like this:
The route can be shortened if the weather makes it necessary. We'll aim for a minimum distance of 2 miles. If 10 miles isn't long enough on a Saturday morning riding to the ride is highly encouraged.
Further details about the Saturday Coffee Shop Rides can be found in this post.
We checked the route this afternoon. Upon completion we reviewed the list of the 50 different types of road snow and found we could mark more than a dozen as ridden.
Happiness is a snow covered fatbike.
Hope we see you Saturday 12/31.
The planned route goes a little something like this:
The route can be shortened if the weather makes it necessary. We'll aim for a minimum distance of 2 miles. If 10 miles isn't long enough on a Saturday morning riding to the ride is highly encouraged.
Further details about the Saturday Coffee Shop Rides can be found in this post.
We checked the route this afternoon. Upon completion we reviewed the list of the 50 different types of road snow and found we could mark more than a dozen as ridden.
Happiness is a snow covered fatbike.
Hope we see you Saturday 12/31.
Tuesday, December 02, 2014
It's Tuesday. People work on Tuesday.
I took a recovery day off work. After a four day weekend Monday seemed like plenty of effort.
So Tuesday I got on the bike and chased this guy around the city.
I made my way to Leaders Park.
I did a lap. I may have spent some time on my back.
I got stopped coming and going trying to get to the other side of the tracks.
I stopped at the falls.
On my way here I greeted my dad on his bike on Phillips Ave.
...for a Lumberjack.
I think I'm ready to face another day at work.
Saturday, November 29, 2014
Announcing: Saturday Coffee Rides
Following the positive spirit that came with the Coffeeneuring Rides, we're going to keep the bikes rolling in the same manner. All year round.
Beginning Saturday December 27 we'll do one ride a month (except when we don't). The ride will be on the last Saturday of the month (except when it's not).
The first ride, December 27th, 9am, will depart from Kaladis at 26th & Minnesota Ave.
Here are the 6 things you can expect from the ride.
1. Meet the group at a coffee shop at 9am. Riding to the venue is preferred, perhaps even rewarded.
2. As a group, ride a 10-ish mile loop from the coffee shop.
3. If you can ride 12mph for an hour on the bike trail come ride with me - I won't leave you. If you can ride 20mph on the bike trial for an hour you might find this ride too mentally taxing.
4. Rule #2's distance is adjustable depending upon weather conditions. We'll aim for a 2 mile minimum loop.
5. The route will be primarily on-street miles. Street selection will lean toward low volume (except when it doesn't).
6. Enjoy coffee together at venue.
7. Disband.
Beginning Saturday December 27 we'll do one ride a month (except when we don't). The ride will be on the last Saturday of the month (except when it's not).
The first ride, December 27th, 9am, will depart from Kaladis at 26th & Minnesota Ave.
Here are the 6 things you can expect from the ride.
1. Meet the group at a coffee shop at 9am. Riding to the venue is preferred, perhaps even rewarded.
2. As a group, ride a 10-ish mile loop from the coffee shop.
3. If you can ride 12mph for an hour on the bike trail come ride with me - I won't leave you. If you can ride 20mph on the bike trial for an hour you might find this ride too mentally taxing.
4. Rule #2's distance is adjustable depending upon weather conditions. We'll aim for a 2 mile minimum loop.
5. The route will be primarily on-street miles. Street selection will lean toward low volume (except when it doesn't).
6. Enjoy coffee together at venue.
7. Disband.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






















